Foundation and Stabilisation of
the Hungarian State and the Church
(10th-13th centuries)
Constantinople and Hungary
(?)
1074-1077 and mid-12th century
Gold, detailed filigree-work
and granulation finish, precious stones (sapphire, almandine, amethist,
spinel, corundum, tourmaline), pearls fit pointedly and onto spun gold,
cloisonné enamel
Heigth: 17.9 cm (not including
the pendants);
Diameter: 19.8-20.9 cm.
|
Copy of the Hungarian coronation regalia
The Hungarian Holy Crown
used to be the most important and most ancient symbol of sovereignty during
the monarchy, that is, for almost ten centuries (until 1946), while today
it is the symbol of Hungarian nation. According to legendary tradition,
Pope Sylvester II sent a crown to young King Vajk of the Árpád
Dynasty – baptised István [Stephen] –, who followed his father,
Géza, on the throne. The name Stephen was probably selected in order
to gain the protection of the holy protomartyr of Passau diocese, who played
a crucial role in the conversion of Sovereign Géza and the Magyars
(cf. Klaniczay, G. Il grande libro dei Santi. Dizionario enciclopedico.
Edizioni San Paolo 1998, 3, pp. 1825-1829). This one is certainly not the
papal crown. The Hungarian Holy Crown is a fascinating assemblage of goldsmith’s
work, which makes it matchless, not merely morphologically, but also because
of its artistic quality. It consists of two different parts which are of
different age and different style. The lower part, a gold circle, on which
triangular and semicircular elements are set, is a Byzantine goldsmith’s
work from the age of Emperor Michael Ducas VII (1071-1078) or possibly
from a little earlier. The research and restoration work, started in 1978,
has already proved that this crown, called ‘Greek’, is still in its original
state apart from the replacement of a few jewels (distinguishable from
the step by step gradual shaping) and five pendants. There are eight, almost
square cloisonné enamel-works between the large, diversiform gemstones
fit into claw settings with subtle exquisiteness. The full-length image
of Christ ‘Pantokrator’ [Lord of All] sitting on a bejewelled throne towers
between two stylised cypresses in a semicircular arch in the middle of
the front of the crown and both initials of his name can be seen in a circular
field. In the pictures below the half-length images of Archangels Michael
and Gabriel are represented, who, holding spears, vigilantly direct their
gaze towards him; then the Saint warriors George and Demetrius and Saint
physicians Cosma and Damian succeed them. Most likely, the three historical
personages pertaining to the arrival of the crown in Hungary appear on
the back side of the crown. All of them are identifiable from the inscriptions.
Above, Emperor Michael Ducas who heads the mundane hierarchy as Christ
heads the heavenly one. His likeness is placed like a mirror image of Christ.
He wears a labarum and a sword symbolising rulership. Emperor Constantin
Porphyrogenitus (913-959) and Géza I, King of Hungary (1074-1077),
who was called the King of ‘Turks’, that is Hungarians, are also present
on the circle. The latter’s rank, being lower than that of the emperors,
is shown by the colour of his name inscription, dark blue, while the name
inscription of the emperors is purple. Also, his gaze is not facing towards
the viewer, as that of Michael Ducas’ and Constantine’s, but to the right,
into the direction of the emperor. However, experts still debate whether
these enamels were made contemporaneously with the crown, or applied later.
This corona graeca was in all likelihood meant for a woman, possibly fashioned
for King Géza’s wife, a Byzantine Princess. There is a wide gemstone
between every even enamelled picture. The middle one, under the Pantokrator,
is an Indian sapphire, triangular cabochon cut, so are the other precious
stones originally mounted in the crown. According to another interpretation,
reviewed in Éva Kovács’s study in 1978, the making of the
crown may be dated back to 1067, to the period of the simultaneous reign
of the two Ducas brothers; in this case the person with ‘Kon’ inscription
would be his brother Constans, not his son Constantine. The bestowal of
the crown can therefore be situated within the framework of a complex political
alliance, which is connected with Sovereign Géza’s struggles for
the recognition of his right to the throne.
The upper part of the crown,
called Latin crown, which is cross-shaped and overarches the Greek crown
in an angle of 90 degrees, indicates more modern and less exquisite workmanship,
mediaeval implementing. Its denomination is due to the Latin inscriptions
surrounding the figures. The four gold plates were fit to the sides of
the middle square, which depicts Christ Pantokrator and is obviously part
of the Greek crown though the symbols of the sun and the moon are present
on it. The polychrome enamelled images of the standing figures of eigth
apostles – Peter, Paul, John, James, Bartholomew, Philip, Thomas and Andrew
– were set onto the cross-connecting bands. The pictures are lined with
pearls and almandine and their sides are decorated with zoomorphic motifs.
It is difficult to determine the place and age of the making of this crown,
it may have been fashioned somewhere in Hungarian territory in the late
12th century. The uniting of the two crown took place in a rather simple
fashion, without any modification of the adjoining parts, using rivets
whose points can still be seen on the smooth surface of the gold plate.
This assemblage was probably done during the reign of Béla III (1171-1196),
perhaps the Latin crown was meant for him. The cross on the top came into
being later, presumably in the middle of the 16th century, replacing an
earlier one, made in the time of Béla III or on the occasion of
the coronation of Endre III in 1290, but this is still disputed. It is
also uncertain exactly when the cross was damaged, which is now bent into
an angle of 12 degrees, it might happen between 1613 and 1793 (cf. De Angelis,
M. A., ”Buda Hungariae Regia”: La battaglia di Buda del 1686 in due quadri
della Pinacoteca Vaticana, appunti sul pittore fiammingo Pieter Hofman,
in Monumenti, Musei e Gallerie Pontificie Bollettino. 7 (1987) pp. 73-93,
particularly p 80). Literary references to the crown are abundant during
the centuries, in 1166 Patriarch Michael Anchilaos mentions a crown, which
is guarded in Székesfehérvár; in 1198 Pope Innocent
III calls the crown ‘honor patriae’ in his letter to the Provost of Székesfehérvár.
In
1256 Béla IV uses the phrase ‘Holy Crown’ in an edict for the first
time. After it served to crown the Hungarian Kings during the entire Middle
Ages, the Holy Crown got into the Treasury of the Hapsburg Dynasty in 1440
and only in 1464 could Matthias Corvinus ransom it so as to be crowned
with it in Buda. Since then all Hungarian rulers have been crowned with
the Holy Crown, including Maria Theresia and Franz Josef. The coronation
ceremony specified that the ruler, with the Holy Crown on his/her head,
must gallop on horseback up an artifical hill (in Buda, or in more difficult
times, in Pozsony), draw his/her sword, strike towards the four quarters
of the globe and vow that s/he would defend Hungary against all enemies
from any direction. |